As we move into 2025, the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) continues to evolve with emerging trends, shifting marketplaces, and legal battles. The latest buzz in the NFT space centers around Getgems, a marketplace betting big on Telegram to drive mass adoption of NFTs, despite a decline in overall NFT trading volumes in 2024. Meanwhile, OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace, is facing user backlash following the release of its private beta and the controversial rollout of its version 2 update. On a different front, sports betting platform DraftKings has reached a settlement with the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) over a lawsuit regarding payments for the use of NFL player likenesses in NFTs. Let’s dive into these stories and more in this week’s edition of the Nifty Newsletter.
Getgems and Telegram: A New Frontier for NFTs in 2025
The world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has seen its ups and downs over the past few years. Following a meteoric rise in popularity, the NFT market experienced a significant downturn in 2024. Trading volumes and sales figures plummeted, leaving many industry players uncertain about the future of digital collectibles. However, amidst this slump, Getgems, an NFT marketplace built on The Open Network (TON), remains steadfast in its belief that NFTs have a bright future ahead. This optimism is rooted in Getgems’ unique strategy, which focuses on leveraging Telegram’s massive user base to drive adoption and awareness for NFTs in 2025.
Why Telegram? The Web3 Opportunity
Telegram, with over 700 million active users globally, has emerged as a key player in the Web3 space. Known for its robust features like channels, groups, and bots, Telegram has successfully integrated blockchain and decentralized technologies into its platform. This move has garnered the attention of various NFT projects, with many viewing Telegram as an ideal vehicle for accelerating Web3 adoption. For Getgems, the partnership with Telegram offers a golden opportunity to connect NFTs with a vastly larger and more engaged audience than ever before.
Unlike other social platforms, Telegram’s user base is known for its high level of interaction and participation in online communities. This offers NFTs a chance to integrate into a network where users are already accustomed to digital assets, making Telegram an ideal platform for pushing the next wave of NFT adoption. Getgems is positioning itself to tap into this engaged audience, harnessing Telegram’s widespread reach to bring NFTs into the daily lives of millions of people.
A Proven Track Record: Getgems’ Success with Previous NFT Collections
Getgems isn’t new to the world of NFTs. The marketplace has already made its mark with successful NFT collections like Usernames and Anonymous Numbers, which generated over $480 million in trading volume. This early success provides Getgems with the foundation it needs to expand its vision for 2025. With previous collections demonstrating significant demand, Getgems is confident that the shift to Telegram will unlock even greater possibilities.
The success of these earlier collections is an important indicator that the Getgems platform has already established a loyal user base. Moreover, these previous projects have proven that there is substantial interest in NFTs within the Telegram ecosystem. With Telegram’s established history of supporting blockchain projects, Getgems is poised to build upon this success by integrating NFTs into a platform that already has the attention and participation of millions.
The Telegram Advantage: Connecting NFTs to a Mass Audience
One of the critical challenges that NFTs have faced in the past is their ability to generate widespread engagement. While NFT projects had their moment in the spotlight, they often struggled to connect with a broader user base outside of early adopters and digital art enthusiasts. Getgems believes that Telegram’s vast, global user base presents a unique solution to this challenge.
With Telegram, Getgems is not just targeting traditional NFT collectors but also opening the doors for a completely new demographic. The platform’s diverse and active user base spans across various countries, languages, and interests, creating an opportunity for NFTs to break out of niche markets and reach the mainstream. By integrating NFTs into Telegram’s infrastructure, Getgems aims to bridge the gap between the world of digital collectibles and everyday users who are already part of Telegram’s thriving community.
This shift could be a game-changer for the NFT space. Getgems sees Telegram not only as a tool for buying and selling NFTs but as a platform for education, community building, and engagement. Through Telegram channels and groups, Getgems could provide valuable content, host virtual events, and facilitate peer-to-peer interactions that help demystify NFTs for the average user. This could lead to a more widespread understanding of NFTs’ potential utility, from digital art and collectibles to use cases in gaming, finance, and beyond.
OpenSea’s New Version Sparks Backlash Over Airdrop and Points System
OpenSea, the world’s largest and most widely used NFT marketplace, has recently unveiled the private beta of its new version, OS2. While many users had been eagerly awaiting the platform’s promised updates and enhancements, the rollout has sparked significant backlash. Complaints are centered around two main issues: the new points system and the upcoming token airdrop. As the dominant player in the NFT market, OpenSea’s latest move has left many of its loyal users feeling disrespected and sidelined. Here’s a deep dive into the controversy surrounding OS2 and why it has left many OpenSea users upset.
OpenSea’s OS2 Rollout: A Step Forward or a Step Back?
OpenSea’s announcement of OS2, its next-generation version of the platform, was met with a lot of anticipation. The promise of major improvements and enhanced features seemed like a significant upgrade. However, the private beta release of the new version has caused frustration for many longtime users who feel that the platform’s changes overlook their contributions to OpenSea’s success.
One of the most contentious issues is the new points system introduced with OS2. In an attempt to reward users for their activity on the platform, OpenSea has implemented a points system that users will accumulate based on their transactions and interactions. However, there’s a major catch: users must start from scratch when it comes to earning these points. This means that long-time OpenSea users who had previously contributed to the platform’s growth by generating significant trading fees are now finding themselves at a disadvantage, as they are not granted retroactive points for their past activity.
This change has sparked frustration among loyal users who feel that their early support and consistent usage of OpenSea should have been acknowledged in the new system. NFT traders, particularly those who have been active since OpenSea’s early days, feel that their contributions have been dismissed in favor of a system that gives equal footing to newer users. The absence of retroactive points feels like a slap in the face to many of OpenSea’s original supporters, who helped build the platform into the giant it is today.
Beanie’s Concerns: A Call for Action
One of the more vocal critics of the new points system is NFT trader Beanie, who took to social media to express his dissatisfaction with OpenSea’s decision. Beanie argued that the new points system fails to recognize the value of the early users who were instrumental in establishing OpenSea’s dominance in the NFT space. In a passionate post, Beanie urged the community to rally together and punish OpenSea by sending its token to zero when it is eventually launched.
Beanie’s comments resonated with many within the NFT community who feel similarly betrayed by OpenSea’s lack of consideration for their past support. His call to action highlights the growing resentment among long-time users who feel that OpenSea is prioritizing the acquisition of new users over those who have been with the platform since its inception.
In an industry that thrives on community support and engagement, the negative response to OpenSea’s OS2 rollout reflects a deeper issue: a failure to recognize and reward the platform’s most dedicated users. While OpenSea has yet to publicly respond to Beanie’s call or address the points system controversy, it is clear that the platform has a trust problem on its hands.
The Token Airdrop Backlash: Unfulfilled Promises
In addition to the points system, the upcoming token airdrop has also fueled frustration among OpenSea’s users. OpenSea had previously promised its community that they would receive tokens as a reward for their continued support. However, the rollout of the airdrop has raised serious concerns regarding the fairness and transparency of the process.
Users have expressed disappointment over the dynamics of the token airdrop, which appear to favor new users over long-time, loyal customers. Many believe that OpenSea has failed to adequately reward those who helped make the platform the leading marketplace in the NFT space. Instead of recognizing and appreciating the contributions of established users, the platform’s focus on attracting new users has alienated those who were instrumental in its success.
The backlash over the token airdrop and points system is a reminder of how crucial community loyalty is in the NFT and Web3 space. OpenSea, as the market leader, has the responsibility to nurture its community and show appreciation for its users. By failing to do so, it risks losing the trust and support of the very people who helped establish its position in the market.
OpenSea’s Dilemma: Alienating Users or Embracing Change?
As OpenSea continues to face backlash over the introduction of OS2, it finds itself at a crossroads. The platform’s core community is upset, and unless OpenSea addresses these concerns quickly, it could risk alienating a large portion of its user base. The NFT marketplace space is highly competitive, with several new platforms emerging and attracting attention from both creators and collectors. OpenSea cannot afford to lose the loyalty of its most dedicated users, as these users are not just buyers and sellers—they are also brand advocates and community leaders who can make or break the platform’s reputation.
OpenSea needs to find a balance between rewarding loyal users and encouraging new user growth. While the introduction of new features and improvements is necessary for the platform’s evolution, it should not come at the expense of the people who helped build OpenSea’s success. By acknowledging the concerns raised by its users, particularly regarding the points system and token airdrop, OpenSea can avoid further alienating its core community.
Moving Forward: Will OpenSea Address User Concerns?
At this point, OpenSea’s next steps are crucial. The NFT marketplace can either listen to its users, acknowledge the frustrations surrounding the OS2 rollout, and make necessary adjustments, or it risks facing a decline in its user base and market dominance. The growing dissatisfaction among users could create opportunities for competing NFT marketplaces to capitalize on OpenSea’s mistakes and offer a more user-friendly experience.
While OpenSea has yet to respond to the backlash, it is clear that the platform needs to take action to restore trust and loyalty among its community. The points system and the token airdrop are not just technical issues—they are a reflection of how OpenSea values its users. In a market where user engagement and loyalty are paramount, OpenSea cannot afford to overlook the people who made it the success it is today.
DraftKings Settles Lawsuit with NFLPA Over NFT Licensing Dispute
DraftKings, a major player in the US sports betting industry, has recently reached a settlement with the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) over a lawsuit involving payments for the use of NFL player likenesses in non-fungible tokens (NFTs). This legal dispute, which began in August, revolved around accusations that DraftKings had used the images and likenesses of NFL players in its NFTs without compensating the players through appropriate royalties. The case, which sought $65 million in damages, has now been resolved through a mediated settlement, with both parties working towards finalizing the agreement by March 28, 2025.
This development represents a crucial moment in the growing intersection of sports, entertainment, and digital assets, highlighting the importance of intellectual property rights in the rapidly evolving NFT landscape. Let’s explore the details of this lawsuit, the settlement, and the broader implications it has for the future of NFTs, licensing, and the sports industry.
The Lawsuit: Allegations of Unpaid Royalties
In August 2024, the NFLPA filed a lawsuit against DraftKings, accusing the sports betting platform of using NFL player likenesses in NFTs sold on its marketplace without properly compensating the athletes. The lawsuit claimed that DraftKings had profited from the sale of these NFTs, which featured player images, without adhering to the standard licensing agreements required for such usage.
The NFLPA, which represents active and retired NFL players, argued that the use of these player likenesses should be subject to the same licensing fees and royalty payments as any other form of intellectual property. According to the lawsuit, DraftKings’ failure to secure the proper licensing or provide the appropriate compensation for these likenesses amounted to an infringement of the players’ rights. As a result, the NFLPA demanded $65 million in damages, reflecting the amount it believed was owed to the players for the unauthorized use of their images.
NFTs, which are unique digital assets often associated with art, collectibles, and other forms of intellectual property, have become increasingly popular in recent years. Their ability to represent ownership of digital goods, such as images and videos, has raised a host of legal questions, particularly regarding the ownership and use of likenesses in NFTs. This case involving DraftKings and the NFLPA is just one of many instances where the legal framework for NFTs is being tested in court.
The Settlement: A Step Toward Resolution
After months of legal proceedings, DraftKings and the NFLPA have finally reached a mediated settlement, putting an end to the lawsuit. While the specifics of the settlement remain confidential, both parties have expressed their satisfaction with the resolution. According to the NFLPA, the two sides are working together to finalize the terms of the agreement by March 28, 2025.
In addition to the settlement, both parties have jointly requested a 60-day stay from the court, which would allow them time to finalize the details of the agreement and avoid a prolonged legal battle. This move suggests that both DraftKings and the NFLPA are eager to put the lawsuit behind them and focus on resolving the issue in a way that is mutually beneficial. Although the full terms of the settlement are not yet known, the fact that a resolution is on the horizon is seen as a positive step for both organizations.
Broader Implications for the NFT Industry
This lawsuit and its settlement bring attention to the growing importance of intellectual property rights in the NFT space, particularly when it comes to licensing agreements and the use of personal likenesses. As the NFT market continues to expand, more industries, including sports, entertainment, and celebrity culture, are exploring ways to integrate NFTs into their business models.
In particular, the case highlights the need for clear licensing agreements between NFT platforms and the individuals whose likenesses are being used in these digital assets. While NFTs have opened up new revenue streams for creators and businesses, they also present significant legal challenges when it comes to the protection of intellectual property. The DraftKings-NFLPA lawsuit serves as a reminder that proper licensing and fair compensation must be central to the creation and sale of NFTs, especially when public figures like athletes are involved.
Moreover, this case illustrates the increasing importance of transparency and accountability in the NFT space. As more celebrities, athletes, and organizations jump on the NFT bandwagon, it is essential that proper legal frameworks are put in place to protect the rights of those involved. Without clear guidelines and agreements, the NFT market could become a breeding ground for legal disputes, as we have seen in this case.
The Future of Sports NFTs: A New Era of Digital Licensing
With the settlement of the DraftKings-NFLPA lawsuit, it seems clear that the sports industry will continue to play a significant role in the growth of the NFT market. However, this case also underscores the importance of establishing fair and transparent licensing practices for NFTs that feature the likenesses of athletes and other public figures. As more sports leagues and organizations begin to explore the potential of NFTs, it will be essential for them to work closely with players’ associations and other stakeholders to ensure that their intellectual property rights are protected and fairly compensated.
In the future, we can expect to see more legal battles over the use of player likenesses in NFTs, particularly as the demand for sports-related digital assets continues to grow. This case sets an important precedent for how these disputes will be handled, highlighting the need for clear contracts, fair royalty systems, and mutual respect between NFT creators, platforms, and the individuals whose images are being used.
Final Thoughts
As we look ahead to 2025, the NFT space continues to be an exciting but volatile arena. Getgems’ bet on Telegram as a platform to drive adoption could be a significant turning point for the industry, especially if it can tap into Telegram’s massive user base and increase engagement with NFTs. However, the ongoing struggles of platforms like OpenSea highlight the challenges of maintaining user loyalty and satisfaction in a rapidly evolving market. With the introduction of new features like points systems and token airdrops, NFT marketplaces must tread carefully to avoid alienating their most dedicated users.
On the legal side, the DraftKings-NFLPA settlement brings clarity to the issue of licensing and royalties for NFTs featuring celebrity likenesses. As the NFT sector matures, we can expect more legal battles and settlements to arise, which will shape the future of intellectual property rights in the digital asset space.
The next few years will be crucial for NFTs, as the industry faces both opportunities and challenges. Whether through new platforms like Getgems or the continued development of existing giants like OpenSea, the path forward will require both innovation and careful attention to the needs of creators, collectors, and users. As always, the NFT market remains dynamic, and only time will tell which projects and platforms will emerge as the true leaders of the space.
FAQs
1. What was the lawsuit between DraftKings and the NFLPA about?
The lawsuit was filed by the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) against DraftKings in August 2024, accusing the sports betting platform of using NFL player likenesses in NFTs without paying the appropriate royalties. The NFLPA sought $65 million in damages for the unauthorized use of these likenesses.
2. What was the outcome of the lawsuit?
The lawsuit has been settled through mediation, with both DraftKings and the NFLPA working together to finalize the agreement by March 28, 2025. The specifics of the settlement remain confidential, but a 60-day stay has been requested to finalize the details and avoid further legal action.
3. Why was the NFLPA upset with DraftKings?
The NFLPA was upset because DraftKings used the images and likenesses of NFL players in its NFTs without obtaining proper licensing or compensating the players. The NFLPA argued that DraftKings had profited from these digital assets without adhering to the standard royalty agreements that are typically required when using player likenesses.
4. How does this settlement affect the NFT industry?
This settlement highlights the growing importance of intellectual property rights in the NFT market. As more industries, including sports, explore the potential of NFTs, this case emphasizes the need for clear licensing agreements and fair compensation for the use of likenesses in digital assets. It also sets a precedent for future legal cases in the NFT space.
5. What does the future hold for NFTs in sports?
The DraftKings-NFLPA settlement signals that NFTs will continue to be a significant part of the sports industry, with both players’ associations and organizations needing to establish clear and fair licensing practices. As demand for sports-related NFTs grows, there will likely be more legal discussions around intellectual property rights and proper compensation for athletes featured in digital assets.
Hopefully, you have enjoyed today’s article. Thanks for reading! Have a fantastic day! Live from the Platinum Crypto Trading Floor.
Earnings Disclaimer: The information you’ll find in this article is for educational purpose only. We make no promise or guarantee of income or earnings. You have to do some work, use your best judgement and perform due diligence before using the information in this article. Your success is still up to you. Nothing in this article is intended to be professional, legal, financial and/or accounting advice. Always seek competent advice from professionals in these matters. If you break the city or other local laws, we will not be held liable for any damages you incur.
